Matthew Reed online
Articles, opinions and other bits written by Matthew Reed
Thursday, February 9, 2017
Moving!
See you there!
~Matt
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Cranberries and elephants
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
Opinion: In support of Mendocino County Measure AF and California's Proposition 64
Wednesday, October 12, 2016
My take on Mendocino County's Measure AI
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
On "real" conversation
I read an article ("Small talk should be banned -- here's why" http://www.wired.co.uk/article/banning-small-talk) on the effect of small talk on relationships. The thesis of the article is that small talk is the lowest common denominator of social interaction with strangers in society, but that restricts the level of depth people can reach with each other.
Of the great many articles that I have read in various media, this one struck a personal note. By my nature, I am a retiring guy with a strong streak of social anxiety. Social situations are difficult for me; to wit, attempting to strike up a conversation with an interesting woman beyond what is required of a commercial exchange in a store is similar to tearing down a cement wall with my bare hands.
This difficulty in forging relationships goes beyond the romantic and into the area of close male friends as well. Social anxiety is relatively ironic for somebody who spends most of their professional life talking to people. The truth is, however, that small talk, or chit-chat, is a skill that I use to both acquire information and keep people at a distance.
Why should I personally want to keep people away? After all, I actually feel isolated a great deal of the time, even in a group. Simply put, I'm afraid of how I might be judged. Much of my instinctual conversation does deal with, as the aforementioned article states, "complex social issues" such as my evolution of perspective on sexuality, race, gender, and god (or gods, if you're so inclined).
And that is the crux of how I perceive my society; we are not allowed to be dynamic people, but rather to be static personalities. For example, as a younger man, I was, to put it mildly, homophobic and racist. It's not a simple conversation to discuss how I went from "it's tab A into slot B" to fully supporting same-sex marriage and LGBTQ rights. Neither is it a five minute discussion to full explore racism against blacks and Hispanics as an actual personal attitude (based on more than simple ignorance) that can be overcome, and not a "oh, there are still racists out there" vague concept. These are ideas that cause many people, myself included, a great deal of discomfort.
I am supposed to be, according to how we present ourselves to the public, as either all one way or all the other. Gray areas need not apply.
And yet, gray areas are really all that there are in life. But they do not lend themselves to small talk. So I have developed a skill with personal engagement that keeps things impersonal and wonder if the day will come when I actually have a conversation with somebody about more than the weather.
Wednesday, September 7, 2016
Paul Bunyan Days 2016 in Fort Bragg, California
Paul Bunyan Days is four days of "things to do" and is one of the great highlights of the year on the Fort Bragg-Mendocino Coast. There's the pie sale, the book sale, the logging games, the parade, a tricycle race, the gem and mineral show, a classic car show, an ugly dog contest, and much more. I managed to get to some of the events. You can watch it below.
If you just stumbled upon this, I hope you follow me on my escapades around Mendocino County.
Thursday, August 11, 2016
Mendocino Coast fiber optic gets diverse
The Mendocino Coast now has a redundant fiber optic and internet outages like those that occurred in 2014 and 2015 should now be prevented.
Sage Statham, business manager for Mendocino Community network, said he received confirmation from AT&T on Tuesday, Aug. 9, that the local internet service provider would now have access to the the South Coast fiber optic circuit.
"We like to call it a diverse circuit because redundant implies that it is not needed," Statham said. "This circuit would allow MCN telephone and data to continue to function even if the main fiber line was down."
In 2014, a break in the fiber optic line on Comptche-Ukiah Road interrupted service to hundreds of customers and businesses, including 911 service. In 2015, a vandal damaged the fiber optic line near Hopland, which blacked out service to much of Mendocino County as well as parts of Humboldt County.
Now, instead of a single circuit supplying all internet service, there is a second fiber optic circuit.
"The main path is the one that has had the two cuts and travels from Santa Rosa to Ukiah, Ukiah to Boonville, Boonville to Comptche, Comptche to Mendocino and finally from Mendocino to Fort Bragg," Statham said. "The secondary path runs Mendocino to Manchester, Manchester to Annapolis and Annapolis to Santa Rosa."
Statham said that AT&T refused to give MCN detailed information on the new circuit, but he was told that the secondary circuit should even be able to run along the Trans Pacific fiber line that goes to Hawaii and Japan.
In the event that the primary fiber optic line is damaged, there will likely be no interruption in service to customers, Statham said. The switch to the second circuit should be automatic.
"It is possible that current calls could drop while the traffic is re-routed, but we believe that they should stay active," he said. If the switch failed to automatically re-route, MCN can manually reconfigure with about 15 minutes of labor by an MCN technician.
Friday, August 5, 2016
The Great Depression and Baseball in Mendocino County
I wasn’t old enough to know about finances and money like that. My whole early life was during a low economic time. I didn’t have too much idea about what value was. When the depression came it didn’t make too many changes to us. Everybody shared their food. If somebody killed a pig and had too much left over, they’d share it with their neighbors. Never went without something to eat. We had it pretty good compared to in the city. Most of the people raised their own food anyway.”[9]
On
The Seals won 1-0, with Matson throwing a complete game to earn the win.[14]
Coastal Mendocino area’s very geography was a deterrent to outside teams playing in
Then on August 4, the newspaper reported that the Winters team had failed to arrive for the game because the team car had broken down.[16]
For four consecutive Sundays, the Seals refunded the fans’ money. That meant that, in addition to games versus Winters and the Oakland Colored Giants, games against two additional out-of-area teams had also been cancelled. The Fort Bragg Junior Chamber of Commerce, responsible for scheduling games and advertising, announced that it would not schedule any more games that year. The season would end for the Seals with two games against
But individual players often demonstrated a remarkable athletic ability, especially considering they practiced but once a week. The players for the Fort Bragg Seals were known well enough to the town that only their last names were used to identify them to readers. Men like Pavioni, Lawson, and Matson played as if they were on the Boston Red Sox or Detroit Tigers, but they could only dream of salaries matching that of Lou Gehrig and DiMaggio.
The Seals, to appearances, were a “bush league” team that was staffed by part-time players. But town baseball games were consistently attended by relatively large crowds of spectators and individual players could often demonstrate a remarkable athletic ability, especially considering they practiced but once a week. In those moments of competition and athleticism, the Seals and the other local teams transported their friends and neighbors out of 1937 Mendocino County, away from labor unrest and economic strife. For that ability alone, the Fort Bragg Seals were professional.
Thursday, May 26, 2016
OPINION: In opposition to Measure U
Measure U forbids social service organizations from operating in the central business district of Fort Bragg "under any circumstances" unless that organization was already there before January 2015. Proponents are engaging in a classic case of Not In My Back Yard, as known as NIMBY. They don't want to see the members of their community who are suffering or who are disadvantaged. They want to close their eyes to the homeless, the disabled, and the poor and pretend that Fort Bragg is still a vibrant small city with more jobs than people.
In addition to the NIMBY aspect of Measure U, it's a very expensive temper tantrum. Proponents of the measure fought against the city giving grant money the Mendocino Coast Hospitality Center for the purchase of the Old Coast Hotel building; they lost the argument. Granted, Fort Bragg's city government gave the community a short shrift in meetings, but that is not the Hospitality Center's fault. And yet, Measure U targets the Hospitality Center because of its mission to work with the homeless and plans to use the building for that purpose.
Proponents would rather the Old Coast Hotel building sit empty in perpetuity than have a business use it for helping people in need. It is intellectually inconsistent to target social service agencies because of their clientele, but not the drinking establishments that do actually contribute to social disorder. Social service agencies such as Hospitality Center serve the better angels of human nature while bars serve booze.
If the issue is how the City of Fort Bragg government, including City Manager Linda Ruffing and the city council, handled community concerns, the awarding of the grant to Hospitality Center, or the Old Coast Hotel ownership's willingness to accept less money for a private nonprofit instead of a private business, those are separate issues that must be the focus of a different initiative, referendum, or recall process. They don't need to result in a discriminatory law targeting those people in the community who might cause Measure U proponents to feel uncomfortable.
Measure U is an attempt to address the wrong issue with the wrong method. It completely misses what's wrong with the city; supporters are making Hospitality Center into a straw man.
The arguments in favor of Measure U are filled with even more fallacies. Proponents argue that the measure "...insures the preservation of our Historic Downtown business district-north to Pine Street and South to Oak Street, from Main Street to McPherson." While this may be the central business district, it is not a cohesive historic district. Indeed, it is not actually a registered historic district in the strictest definition. Visitors to the coast would have to travel to Mendocino to find an actual historic district. The central business district is a hodge-podge of historic buildings and contemporary structures. Buildings from the 19th century are nestled against others from the 1920s and later.
Measure U proponents want voters to "Vote Yes if you want to preserve the historic use and structure of the Old Coast Hotel." The logic is untenable. The hotel was sitting empty. Community members who wanted to acquire the building and use it commercially were rebuffed by the property owner unwilling to negotiate on price; yet those same owners negotiated a deal with the City of Fort Bragg. The historic Oak Hotel across the street from the Old Coast Hotel is a seedy-looking collection of apartments once a notable lodging establishment comparable with the long-gone Piedmont Hotel. There is no hue and cry to restore the Oak Hotel to its historic use.
In addition, supporters of Measure U argue in the voter information pamphlet that "...the city's rich history should be celebrated and business's [sic] allowed to prosper." Fort Bragg's "rich history" is one of industry and jobs. It was a mill town with a thriving fishing harbor. The city has always been the commercial and economic center for the Fort Bragg-Mendocino Coast. If proponents truly wish for business to prosper, it needs to find ways to become collectively competitive with inland businesses. They need to fill the empty stores on Franklin Street and offer basic affordable necessities, instead of junk antiques and specialty boutiques.
Fort Bragg is not the town it once was. It is part of an area that is losing businesses and professionals. Cottage industries are not filling in the void left by the closing of the mill nor are they refilling the coffers of the schools that made this area so attractive to professionals with young families. If the business and property owners in the central business district want to better help the city, they need to address the issues that have contributed to the vacant storefronts on Franklin Street and the inability of the area to either build or attract large-scale employers.
It is not the purpose of public law or the initiative process to target specific groups or industries unless the case can be made clearly that the law will benefit the greater good. Laws that are exclusionary need to be so to serve the greater good, such as limitations on what businesses or individuals can be within a certain distance of schools. Measure U does not serve the greater good. It only serves the venal impulses of our human nature. It is in the same group of proposed social controls as excluding all Muslims from the United States or making law enforcement stops of people based on skin color.
I encourage voters in Fort Bragg to vote "no" on Measure U.
Sunday, May 8, 2016
OPINION: In support of Measure V
When I was reporting for Mendocino's weekly community newspaper, The Beacon, part of my beat were rural fire departments south of Fort Bragg, California. One of those tiny departments was the Albion-Little River Volunteer Fire Department, an agency that covers an incredible geographic area that includes a lot of commercial timber land, most of it owned by the Mendocino Redwood Company.
In 2014, ALRVFD Chief Ted Williams became increasingly concerned about dead trees on MRC property left behind by the timber management practice known as "hack-and-squirt." Hack-and-squirt involves making a cut in an undesirable tree, such as tan oak, and then applying an herbicide to the cut. There are different herbicides used in the timber management industry, but one commonly used is imazapyr. The trees are then left to die and fall on their own.
2014 was also a year with record temperatures and low rainfall. In Mendocino, residents within the Mendocino City Community Services District were mandated to install water meters on their wells to help the district manage the limited groundwater. In the northern portion of Mendocino County later that year, over 12,500 acres burned near Laytonville when a wildfire was ignited by lightning.
In the early months of 2015, Williams had no reason to believe things would be different and there were hundreds of acres of dead timber bordering his fire district. He took his concerns to the Albion-Little River Fire Protection District board of directors, looking for a solution and then broadened his approach to include community members and fire professionals.
When I interviewed Mike Jani in March 2015 for a Beacon article, the issue of dead standing trees was quickly becoming a topic of concern for several coastal communities. Jani, the president and chief forester at MRC, attempted to minimize the dangers from standing dead timber.
“Our experience with the way fire reacts is it stays on the ground and doesn’t get into the canopy,” he said. “Albion-Little River Fire Protection District may have been ill-informed of the fire risk.”
Over a year later, MRC has spent $197,000 fighting against the county-wide measure, Measure V, that would make dead standing timber a public nuisance. In late March of this year, at a public forum moderated by the League of Women Voters, the timber company, with other opponents of the June measure, argued against Measure V on the basis of cost as well as creating a beneficial environmental situation; opponents continued to argue against the danger of dead timber as potential fuel in wildfires.
And while MRC has donated plenty of time and money to Mendocino County communities over the years, in this issue the company is wrong. The risks involved with hundreds of acres of dead timber seem self-evident. It is essentially miles of firewood waiting to be lit. Those potentially burning trees put first responders at risk due to falling snags, to say nothing of the question of whether those dead trees create unusually toxic smoke when they burn because of residual herbicide.
Measure V is needed to ensure that the negligence of property owners such as MRC does not endanger communities or firefighters. While I can understand the argument of trying to limit expenses, there is a point when common sense needs to rule over commercial expediency.
No landowner, whether it is an individual or a corporation, has the right to put their neighbor at risk because of one or more dead trees. MRC needs to accept it's responsibility to the greater community good, not just its bottom line.